rs2227934

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.3531C>A(p.Ala1177Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.168 in 1,613,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23,763 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 1904 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.17 ( 21859 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.00

Variant links:

Genes affected

BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BLM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).

BP6

Variant 15-90803693-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90803693-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92395.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-90803693-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.184 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BLM	NM_000057.4 link	c.3531C>A	p.Ala1177Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 22	ENST00000355112.8	NP_000048.1	P54132

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BLM	ENST00000355112.8 link	c.3531C>A	p.Ala1177Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 22	1	NM_000057.4	ENSP00000347232.3		P54132

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.154

AC:

23353

AN:

151944

Hom.:

1907

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0965

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.171

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.178

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0925

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.146

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.161

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.187

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.149

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.151

AC:

38074

AN:

251328

Hom.:

3104

AF XY:

0.150

AC XY:

20440

AN XY:

135848

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.121

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0884

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.166

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.180

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0888

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.146

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.187

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.156

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.170

AC:

248242

AN:

1461496

Hom.:

21859

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.168

AC XY:

122051

AN XY:

727062

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.117

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0935

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.165

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.177

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0891

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.147

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.182

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.163

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.154

AC:

23361

AN:

152062

Hom.:

1904

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.150

AC XY:

11157

AN XY:

74322

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.121

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.111

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.171

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.179

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0934

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.146

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.187

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.149

Alfa

AF:

0.172

Hom.:

2992

Bravo

AF:

0.149

Asia WGS

AF:

0.136

AC:

474

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome

Benign:6

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2017

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Mar 28, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Jul 29, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

BLM-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 15, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

3.0

DANN

Benign

0.50

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over