rs2229680

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006516.4(SLC2A1):​c.966C>T​(p.Val322Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0126 in 1,613,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,163 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.067 ( 1152 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0069 ( 1011 hom. )

Consequence

SLC2A1
NM_006516.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC2A1 (HGNC:11005): (solute carrier family 2 member 1) This gene encodes a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood-brain barrier. The encoded protein is found primarily in the cell membrane and on the cell surface, where it can also function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) I and II. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 1-42929216-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42929216-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95418.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-42929216-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.54 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.228 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC2A1NM_006516.4 linkc.966C>T p.Val322Val synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 10 ENST00000426263.10 NP_006507.2 P11166Q59GX2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC2A1ENST00000426263.10 linkc.966C>T p.Val322Val synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 10 1 NM_006516.4 ENSP00000416293.2 P11166

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0668
AC:
10162
AN:
152172
Hom.:
1141
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.232
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000808
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0450
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0171
AC:
4299
AN:
251068
Hom.:
456
AF XY:
0.0128
AC XY:
1735
AN XY:
135736
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000643
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00691
AC:
10091
AN:
1461296
Hom.:
1011
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00597
AC XY:
4340
AN XY:
726992
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.240
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000661
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000422
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0671
AC:
10212
AN:
152290
Hom.:
1152
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0647
AC XY:
4817
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.232
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000809
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0445
Alfa
AF:
0.0195
Hom.:
195
Bravo
AF:
0.0751
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0150
AC:
52
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000949

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Mar 22, 2012
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dystonia 9 Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Feb 25, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Childhood onset GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 1, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cryohydrocytosis with reduced stomatin Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
0.90
DANN
Benign
0.86

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229680; hg19: chr1-43394887; API