rs2229919

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):​c.1902C>T​(p.Asn634Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

DNM2
NM_001005361.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.87

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
DNM2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2M
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • fetal akinesia-cerebral and retinal hemorrhage syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • hereditary spastic paraplegia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 19-10825065-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10825065-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158521.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.87 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0014 (213/152266) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00243 (165/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00212. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 108 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNM2NM_001005361.3 linkc.1902C>T p.Asn634Asn synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 21 ENST00000389253.9 NP_001005361.1 P50570-4Q8N1K8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNM2ENST00000389253.9 linkc.1902C>T p.Asn634Asn synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 21 5 NM_001005361.3 ENSP00000373905.4 P50570-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00140
AC:
213
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00243
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00144
AC:
361
AN:
251102
AF XY:
0.00138
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00262
AC:
3823
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00258
AC XY:
1874
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000418
AC:
14
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00130
AC:
58
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000301
AC:
26
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000150
AC:
8
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00324
AC:
3603
AN:
1111988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
111
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
248
497
745
994
1242
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
146
292
438
584
730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
213
AN:
152266
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000409
AC:
17
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
23
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000377
AC:
4
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
165
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
23
35
46
58
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00185
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00138
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00294
EpiControl
AF:
0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Mar 16, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 30, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 16, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:4
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DNM2: BP4, BP7 -

Jun 11, 2018
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jul 11, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
2.1
DANN
Benign
0.34
PhyloP100
-1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229919; hg19: chr19-10935741; COSMIC: COSV58957828; COSMIC: COSV58957828; API