Menu
GeneBe

rs2234962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.451T>C(p.Cys151Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.195 in 1,613,424 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33,563 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C151H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 2112 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 31451 hom. )

Consequence

BAG3
NM_004281.4 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.566
Variant links:
Genes affected
BAG3 (HGNC:939): (BAG cochaperone 3) BAG proteins compete with Hip for binding to the Hsc70/Hsp70 ATPase domain and promote substrate release. All the BAG proteins have an approximately 45-amino acid BAG domain near the C terminus but differ markedly in their N-terminal regions. The protein encoded by this gene contains a WW domain in the N-terminal region and a BAG domain in the C-terminal region. The BAG domains of BAG1, BAG2, and BAG3 interact specifically with the Hsc70 ATPase domain in vitro and in mammalian cells. All 3 proteins bind with high affinity to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 and inhibit its chaperone activity in a Hip-repressible manner. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.001447022).
BP6
Variant 10-119670121-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-119670121-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44783.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-119670121-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.205 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BAG3NM_004281.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.451T>C p.Cys151Arg missense_variant 2/4 ENST00000369085.8
BAG3XM_005270287.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.451T>C p.Cys151Arg missense_variant 2/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BAG3ENST00000369085.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.451T>C p.Cys151Arg missense_variant 2/41 NM_004281.4 P1
BAG3ENST00000450186.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.277T>C p.Cys93Arg missense_variant 3/55

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.147
AC:
22296
AN:
152058
Hom.:
2111
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0368
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.193
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.130
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.213
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.201
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.227
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.130
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.208
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.139
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.173
AC:
43222
AN:
249702
Hom.:
4544
AF XY:
0.181
AC XY:
24501
AN XY:
135268
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.100
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.210
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.218
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.184
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.200
AC:
292948
AN:
1461248
Hom.:
31451
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.202
AC XY:
147111
AN XY:
726872
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0305
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.223
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.187
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.147
AC:
22298
AN:
152176
Hom.:
2112
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.147
AC XY:
10956
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0368
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.130
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.213
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.202
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.227
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.208
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.137
Alfa
AF:
0.196
Hom.:
7063
Bravo
AF:
0.133
TwinsUK
AF:
0.210
AC:
777
ALSPAC
AF:
0.210
AC:
808
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0414
AC:
182
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.207
AC:
1782
ExAC
AF:
0.175
AC:
21195
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0740
AC:
260
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.210
EpiControl
AF:
0.208

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 08, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 19, 2012p.Cys151Arg in Exon 02 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 20.5% (1437/7016) of European Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2234962). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 11, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 12, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 19, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.51
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.45
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0014
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
2.4e-7
P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N;D
REVEL
Benign
0.28
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0080
D;T
Polyphen
0.66
P;.
Vest4
0.20
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
0.064
Varity_R
0.33
gMVP
0.42

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2234962; hg19: chr10-121429633; COSMIC: COSV64841867; API