rs2266782
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001002294.3(FMO3):c.472G>A(p.Glu158Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.402 in 1,613,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 133,065 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001002294.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMO3 | NM_001002294.3 | c.472G>A | p.Glu158Lys | missense_variant | 4/9 | ENST00000367755.9 | NP_001002294.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMO3 | ENST00000367755.9 | c.472G>A | p.Glu158Lys | missense_variant | 4/9 | 1 | NM_001002294.3 | ENSP00000356729 | P1 | |
ENST00000669750.1 | n.533+60279C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.407 AC: 61759AN: 151854Hom.: 12984 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.374 AC: 93922AN: 251054Hom.: 18420 AF XY: 0.374 AC XY: 50729AN XY: 135670
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.401 AC: 586405AN: 1461262Hom.: 120066 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.400 AC XY: 290715AN XY: 726942
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.407 AC: 61800AN: 151974Hom.: 12999 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.404 AC XY: 29988AN XY: 74302
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 06, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32653296, 23510775, 31240165, 19321370, 17531949, 10479479, 11773868, 23211429, 10896299, 23791655, 23266626, 17142560, 12814961, 9282831, 17584019, 25870212, 11136294) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Trimethylaminuria Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
See cases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | Mar 28, 2022 | ACMG classification criteria: BA1, BS1, BP4 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at