Menu
GeneBe

rs2279582

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.3762C>T​(p.Asp1254=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00699 in 1,613,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 68 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0058 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0071 ( 61 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.09
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 5-128335540-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128335540-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137325.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128335540-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-128335540-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.09 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00585 (891/152328) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0209 (108/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0177. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 468 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 891 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3762C>T p.Asp1254= synonymous_variant 29/65 ENST00000262464.9
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3609C>T p.Asp1203= synonymous_variant 28/64

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3762C>T p.Asp1254= synonymous_variant 29/651 NM_001999.4 P1P35556-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00587
AC:
893
AN:
152210
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00622
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00525
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00719
AC:
1808
AN:
251290
Hom.:
19
AF XY:
0.00712
AC XY:
967
AN XY:
135804
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00649
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00783
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00711
AC:
10386
AN:
1461598
Hom.:
61
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00682
AC XY:
4962
AN XY:
727118
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00722
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00585
AC:
891
AN:
152328
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00628
AC XY:
468
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00622
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00473
Alfa
AF:
0.00578
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00485
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00837
AC:
29
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00627
EpiControl
AF:
0.00563

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 21, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 20, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 21, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 14, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncNov 01, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenNov 01, 2018- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 13, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenNov 13, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
8.1
DANN
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2279582; hg19: chr5-127671232; COSMIC: COSV52527850; API