rs2293275
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000294954.12(LHCGR):āc.935A>Gā(p.Asn312Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.582 in 1,565,618 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 273,076 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000294954.12 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHCGR | NM_000233.4 | c.935A>G | p.Asn312Ser | missense_variant | 10/11 | ENST00000294954.12 | NP_000224.2 | |
STON1-GTF2A1L | NM_001198593.2 | c.3441+22556T>C | intron_variant | NP_001185522.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHCGR | ENST00000294954.12 | c.935A>G | p.Asn312Ser | missense_variant | 10/11 | 1 | NM_000233.4 | ENSP00000294954 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.524 AC: 79577AN: 151958Hom.: 22629 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.613 AC: 143913AN: 234642Hom.: 46054 AF XY: 0.613 AC XY: 77420AN XY: 126368
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.589 AC: 832319AN: 1413542Hom.: 250445 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.590 AC XY: 415494AN XY: 704166
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.523 AC: 79610AN: 152076Hom.: 22631 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.531 AC XY: 39499AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26662070, 22882535, 24792890, 22356187) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Leydig cell agenesis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Gonadotropin-independent familial sexual precocity Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at