rs2297815

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_015404.4(WHRN):​c.117G>A​(p.Val39Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.35 in 1,592,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 100,676 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.33 ( 8605 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.35 ( 92071 hom. )

Consequence

WHRN
NM_015404.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.584

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]
WHRN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 9-114504685-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-114504685-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45644.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.368 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WHRNNM_015404.4 linkc.117G>A p.Val39Val synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 12 ENST00000362057.4 NP_056219.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WHRNENST00000362057.4 linkc.117G>A p.Val39Val synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 12 1 NM_015404.4 ENSP00000354623.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.326
AC:
49598
AN:
152038
Hom.:
8609
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.237
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.338
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.336
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.344
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.139
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.220
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.507
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.315
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.372
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.325
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.326
AC:
69865
AN:
214404
AF XY:
0.325
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.239
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.330
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.359
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.494
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.371
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.355
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.353
AC:
508433
AN:
1440726
Hom.:
92071
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
0.350
AC XY:
250231
AN XY:
715960
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.227
AC:
7493
AN:
32980
American (AMR)
AF:
0.326
AC:
14211
AN:
43582
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.354
AC:
8967
AN:
25366
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.172
AC:
6757
AN:
39248
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.226
AC:
19117
AN:
84554
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.487
AC:
21559
AN:
44252
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.305
AC:
1591
AN:
5220
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.370
AC:
409326
AN:
1105912
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.326
AC:
19412
AN:
59612
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20914
41828
62741
83655
104569
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12828
25656
38484
51312
64140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.326
AC:
49587
AN:
152154
Hom.:
8605
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.329
AC XY:
24498
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.236
AC:
9795
AN:
41540
American (AMR)
AF:
0.336
AC:
5139
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.344
AC:
1193
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.139
AC:
717
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.220
AC:
1062
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.507
AC:
5363
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.291
AC:
85
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.372
AC:
25248
AN:
67956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.321
AC:
678
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1763
3526
5290
7053
8816
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
496
992
1488
1984
2480
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.339
Hom.:
3641
Bravo
AF:
0.308
Asia WGS
AF:
0.204
AC:
713
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jun 12, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 26, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Benign:2
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.96
PhyloP100
0.58
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2297815; hg19: chr9-117266965; COSMIC: COSV54328205; COSMIC: COSV54328205; API