rs2302387

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000443.4(ABCB4):​c.175C>T​(p.Leu59Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.159 in 1,612,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24,223 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 5350 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.15 ( 18873 hom. )

Consequence

ABCB4
NM_000443.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.790

Publications

44 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCB4 (HGNC:45): (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 4) The membrane-associated protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MDR/TAP subfamily. Members of the MDR/TAP subfamily are involved in multidrug resistance as well as antigen presentation. This gene encodes a full transporter and member of the p-glycoprotein family of membrane proteins with phosphatidylcholine as its substrate. The function of this protein has not yet been determined; however, it may involve transport of phospholipids from liver hepatocytes into bile. Alternative splicing of this gene results in several products of undetermined function. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ABCB4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • gallbladder disease 1
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • pancreatitis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 7-87462869-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-87462869-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 256158.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.79 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.437 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ABCB4NM_000443.4 linkc.175C>T p.Leu59Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 28 ENST00000649586.2 NP_000434.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCB4ENST00000649586.2 linkc.175C>T p.Leu59Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 28 NM_000443.4 ENSP00000496956.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.229
AC:
34844
AN:
151828
Hom.:
5330
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.442
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.126
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.160
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.196
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.201
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.133
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.139
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.180
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.143
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.198
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.170
AC:
42718
AN:
251194
AF XY:
0.164
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.449
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.188
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.194
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.152
AC:
222260
AN:
1460648
Hom.:
18873
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.151
AC XY:
109789
AN XY:
726670
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.449
AC:
14993
AN:
33390
American (AMR)
AF:
0.166
AC:
7431
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.188
AC:
4900
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.223
AC:
8839
AN:
39672
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.140
AC:
12073
AN:
86208
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.139
AC:
7440
AN:
53408
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.213
AC:
1230
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.140
AC:
155123
AN:
1111012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.170
AC:
10231
AN:
60360
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8456
16913
25369
33826
42282
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5828
11656
17484
23312
29140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.230
AC:
34914
AN:
151946
Hom.:
5350
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.226
AC XY:
16814
AN XY:
74264
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.442
AC:
18309
AN:
41418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.160
AC:
2443
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.196
AC:
681
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.201
AC:
1036
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.132
AC:
637
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.139
AC:
1465
AN:
10542
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.187
AC:
55
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.144
AC:
9751
AN:
67946
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.200
AC:
422
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1238
2475
3713
4950
6188
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
332
664
996
1328
1660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.171
Hom.:
7675
Bravo
AF:
0.241
Asia WGS
AF:
0.188
AC:
655
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.144
EpiControl
AF:
0.144

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy, 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.64
PhyloP100
0.79
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2302387; hg19: chr7-87092185; COSMIC: COSV55942293; API