rs2555170

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000391.4(TPP1):ā€‹c.441A>Gā€‹(p.Glu147=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00764 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 769 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.040 ( 406 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0043 ( 363 hom. )

Consequence

TPP1
NM_000391.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0840
Variant links:
Genes affected
TPP1 (HGNC:2073): (tripeptidyl peptidase 1) This gene encodes a member of the sedolisin family of serine proteases. The protease functions in the lysosome to cleave N-terminal tripeptides from substrates, and has weaker endopeptidase activity. It is synthesized as a catalytically-inactive enzyme which is activated and auto-proteolyzed upon acidification. Mutations in this gene result in late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, which is associated with the failure to degrade specific neuropeptides and a subunit of ATP synthase in the lysosome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 11-6617368-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-6617368-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130610.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.084 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.135 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TPP1NM_000391.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.441A>G p.Glu147= synonymous_variant 5/13 ENST00000299427.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TPP1ENST00000299427.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.441A>G p.Glu147= synonymous_variant 5/131 NM_000391.4 P1O14773-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0400
AC:
6080
AN:
152040
Hom.:
405
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0325
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0107
AC:
2688
AN:
251468
Hom.:
156
AF XY:
0.00791
AC XY:
1075
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00731
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000695
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00570
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00427
AC:
6240
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
363
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00373
AC XY:
2712
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00836
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000337
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0106
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0401
AC:
6097
AN:
152156
Hom.:
406
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0388
AC XY:
2889
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.138
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0322
Alfa
AF:
0.0237
Hom.:
117
Bravo
AF:
0.0463
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 24, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 05, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMay 16, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 18, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
9.2
DANN
Benign
0.78
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2555170; hg19: chr11-6638599; API