rs274558

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):​c.807A>G​(p.Leu269Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.405 in 1,613,282 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137,840 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L269L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.41 ( 13083 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.40 ( 124757 hom. )

Consequence

SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.264

Publications

50 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
SLC22A5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • systemic primary carnitine deficiency disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 5-132385482-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132385482-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 94101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.264 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.651 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC22A5NM_003060.4 linkc.807A>G p.Leu269Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000245407.8 NP_003051.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC22A5ENST00000245407.8 linkc.807A>G p.Leu269Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 1 NM_003060.4 ENSP00000245407.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.406
AC:
61672
AN:
151926
Hom.:
13075
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.239
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.352
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.416
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.670
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.640
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.512
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.491
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.395
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.391
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.435
AC:
109359
AN:
251282
AF XY:
0.448
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.357
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.316
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.509
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.387
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.421
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.404
AC:
591038
AN:
1461238
Hom.:
124757
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
0.412
AC XY:
299529
AN XY:
726990
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.354
AC:
11847
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.325
AC:
14529
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.400
AC:
10465
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.668
AC:
26506
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.621
AC:
53552
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.505
AC:
26976
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.471
AC:
2713
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.377
AC:
419332
AN:
1111434
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.416
AC:
25118
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18550
37100
55651
74201
92751
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13320
26640
39960
53280
66600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.406
AC:
61712
AN:
152044
Hom.:
13083
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.417
AC XY:
30987
AN XY:
74306
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.359
AC:
14881
AN:
41452
American (AMR)
AF:
0.352
AC:
5384
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.416
AC:
1443
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.670
AC:
3458
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.642
AC:
3096
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.512
AC:
5411
AN:
10564
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.473
AC:
139
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.395
AC:
26854
AN:
67956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.391
AC:
828
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1847
3694
5541
7388
9235
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
594
1188
1782
2376
2970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.387
Hom.:
30713
Bravo
AF:
0.385
Asia WGS
AF:
0.617
AC:
2144
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.385
EpiControl
AF:
0.376

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal carnitine transport defect Benign:7
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2017
Phosphorus, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Dec 07, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Apr 18, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.807A>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in synonymous amino acid change. Mutatation Taster predicts polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice-site tools via Alamut predict that this variant does not affect the consensus splice donor site though it may create a cryptic splice donor site as predicted by 3/5 tools. However, in silico prediction results are not definite and there are no functional studies to confirm this. This variant is found in 53257/121244 control chromosomes (12476 homozygotes) from the large and broad populations of ExAC at a frequency of 0.4392547, which is about 96 times greater than the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0045644) in this gene. Thus this variant is a common polymorphism found in general population. In one family, this variant was found in cis with a potentially pathogenic variant p.Leu476Arg in homozygous state in two affected siblings and was found in homozygous state in the unaffected father of the siblings (Mutlu-Albayrak_2015) -- an evidence of lack of cosegregation which further supports the benign outcome. One clinical laboratory has classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
7.1
DANN
Benign
0.53
PhyloP100
-0.26
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs274558; hg19: chr5-131721174; COSMIC: COSV55373003; COSMIC: COSV55373003; API