rs274558
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):āc.807A>Gā(p.Leu269=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.405 in 1,613,282 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137,840 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.41 ( 13083 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.40 ( 124757 hom. )
Consequence
SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 synonymous
NM_003060.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.264
Genes affected
SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 5-132385482-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132385482-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 94101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-132385482-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.264 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.651 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC22A5 | NM_003060.4 | c.807A>G | p.Leu269= | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000245407.8 | NP_003051.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC22A5 | ENST00000245407.8 | c.807A>G | p.Leu269= | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_003060.4 | ENSP00000245407 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.406 AC: 61672AN: 151926Hom.: 13075 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
61672
AN:
151926
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.435 AC: 109359AN: 251282Hom.: 25387 AF XY: 0.448 AC XY: 60802AN XY: 135822
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
109359
AN:
251282
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
60802
AN XY:
135822
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.404 AC: 591038AN: 1461238Hom.: 124757 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.412 AC XY: 299529AN XY: 726990
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
591038
AN:
1461238
Hom.:
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
AC XY:
299529
AN XY:
726990
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.406 AC: 61712AN: 152044Hom.: 13083 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.417 AC XY: 30987AN XY: 74306
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
61712
AN:
152044
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
30987
AN XY:
74306
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2144
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Renal carnitine transport defect Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Phosphorus, Inc. | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 20, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jun 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 07, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 18, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.807A>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in synonymous amino acid change. Mutatation Taster predicts polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice-site tools via Alamut predict that this variant does not affect the consensus splice donor site though it may create a cryptic splice donor site as predicted by 3/5 tools. However, in silico prediction results are not definite and there are no functional studies to confirm this. This variant is found in 53257/121244 control chromosomes (12476 homozygotes) from the large and broad populations of ExAC at a frequency of 0.4392547, which is about 96 times greater than the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0045644) in this gene. Thus this variant is a common polymorphism found in general population. In one family, this variant was found in cis with a potentially pathogenic variant p.Leu476Arg in homozygous state in two affected siblings and was found in homozygous state in the unaffected father of the siblings (Mutlu-Albayrak_2015) -- an evidence of lack of cosegregation which further supports the benign outcome. One clinical laboratory has classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at