rs2754155

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.4566T>C (p.Thr1522=) variant in the MYH7 gene is 2.98% (376/11574) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29300372). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA015116/MONDO:0004994/002

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 16 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0095 ( 132 hom. )

Consequence

MYH7
NM_000257.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.423

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH7 (HGNC:7577): (myosin heavy chain 7) Muscle myosin is a hexameric protein containing 2 heavy chain subunits, 2 alkali light chain subunits, and 2 regulatory light chain subunits. This gene encodes the beta (or slow) heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. It is expressed predominantly in normal human ventricle. It is also expressed in skeletal muscle tissues rich in slow-twitch type I muscle fibers. Changes in the relative abundance of this protein and the alpha (or fast) heavy subunit of cardiac myosin correlate with the contractile velocity of cardiac muscle. Its expression is also altered during thyroid hormone depletion and hemodynamic overloading. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myosin storage myopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and Laing distal myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
MHRT (HGNC:51291): (myosin heavy chain associated RNA transcript) This gene encodes a spliced long non-coding RNA that may act as a cardioprotective agent in the heart. Based on a study of a similar gene in mouse, the encoded transcript may regulate chromatin remodeling by acting as a decoy to the BRG1 chromatin repressor complex thus preventing it from binding to its genomic targets. Blocking the actions of BRG1 could be crucial in protecting the heart from pathological hypertrophy. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH7NM_000257.4 linkc.4566T>C p.Thr1522Thr synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 40 ENST00000355349.4 NP_000248.2 P12883
MYH7NM_001407004.1 linkc.4566T>C p.Thr1522Thr synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 39 NP_001393933.1
MHRTNR_126491.1 linkn.589A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH7ENST00000355349.4 linkc.4566T>C p.Thr1522Thr synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 40 1 NM_000257.4 ENSP00000347507.3 P12883
MYH7ENST00000713768.1 linkc.4566T>C p.Thr1522Thr synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 41 ENSP00000519070.1
MYH7ENST00000713769.1 linkc.4566T>C p.Thr1522Thr synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 39 ENSP00000519071.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00893
AC:
1360
AN:
152212
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0149
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00967
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0134
AC:
3367
AN:
251480
AF XY:
0.0139
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0319
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00813
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00833
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0117
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00955
AC:
13954
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
132
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0103
AC XY:
7483
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
68
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0295
AC:
1319
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00715
AC:
187
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0293
AC:
2525
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0125
AC:
669
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
104
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00771
AC:
8578
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00831
AC:
502
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1099
2198
3296
4395
5494
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
308
616
924
1232
1540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00891
AC:
1358
AN:
152330
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00932
AC XY:
694
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00216
AC:
90
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0174
AC:
266
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00864
AC:
30
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0261
AC:
126
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0149
AC:
158
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
5
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00967
AC:
658
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0113
AC:
24
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
71
142
212
283
354
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00823
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00872
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00982
AC:
34
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00774
EpiControl
AF:
0.00741

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Mar 25, 2008
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 21, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Mar 05, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 15, 2016
ClinGen Cardiomyopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.4566T>C (p.Thr1522=) variant in the MYH7 gene is 2.98% (376/11574) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29300372). -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Oct 10, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MYH7-related skeletal myopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myosin storage myopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jun 19, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
5.5
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
-0.42
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2754155; hg19: chr14-23886155; API