rs28363394
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001903.5(CTNNA1):c.536C>T(p.Ala179Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00202 in 1,613,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
CTNNA1
NM_001903.5 missense
NM_001903.5 missense
Scores
4
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.02
Genes affected
CTNNA1 (HGNC:2509): (catenin alpha 1) This gene encodes a member of the catenin family of proteins that play an important role in cell adhesion process by connecting cadherins located on the plasma membrane to the actin filaments inside the cell. The encoded mechanosensing protein contains three vinculin homology domains and undergoes conformational changes in response to cytoskeletal tension, resulting in the reconfiguration of cadherin-actin filament connections. Certain mutations in this gene cause butterfly-shaped pigment dystrophy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), CTNNA1. . Gene score misZ 3.6624 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.1669 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with patterned macular dystrophy 2, CTNNA1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome, patterned macular dystrophy, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022231042).
BP6
Variant 5-138812250-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-138812250-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 415353.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-138812250-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 222 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNNA1 | NM_001903.5 | c.536C>T | p.Ala179Val | missense_variant | 5/18 | ENST00000302763.12 | NP_001894.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNNA1 | ENST00000302763.12 | c.536C>T | p.Ala179Val | missense_variant | 5/18 | 1 | NM_001903.5 | ENSP00000304669.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152008Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
222
AN:
152008
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00117 AC: 294AN: 251350Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 163AN XY: 135832
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
294
AN:
251350
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
163
AN XY:
135832
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00208 AC: 3038AN: 1461534Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00206 AC XY: 1501AN XY: 727080
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3038
AN:
1461534
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1501
AN XY:
727080
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152126Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 100AN XY: 74376
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
222
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
74376
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
21
ExAC
AF:
AC:
143
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | CTNNA1: BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 17, 2021 | - - |
CTNNA1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 23, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 26, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
.;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
B;B;.;.;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at