rs28383481

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM5BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):​c.1463G>A​(p.Arg488His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00456 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R488C) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0034 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0047 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 missense

Scores

1
10
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:5U:10B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.76
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr5-132393687-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.017382115).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00342 (520/152254) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00713 (109/15298). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00604. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 255 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 26 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC22A5NM_003060.4 linkc.1463G>A p.Arg488His missense_variant Exon 9 of 10 ENST00000245407.8 NP_003051.1 O76082-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC22A5ENST00000245407.8 linkc.1463G>A p.Arg488His missense_variant Exon 9 of 10 1 NM_003060.4 ENSP00000245407.3 O76082-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00342
AC:
520
AN:
152136
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00713
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00522
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00325
AC:
817
AN:
251442
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00321
AC XY:
436
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000923
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00483
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000739
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00466
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00603
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00467
AC:
6834
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00459
AC XY:
3339
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000687
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00449
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00557
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00373
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00342
AC:
520
AN:
152254
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00343
AC XY:
255
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00713
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00522
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00454
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00343
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00728
AC:
27
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00519
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00523
AC:
45
ExAC
AF:
0.00326
AC:
396
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00491
EpiControl
AF:
0.00415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:5Uncertain:10Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal carnitine transport defect Pathogenic:3Uncertain:9Benign:2
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2024
Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Jul 21, 2017
Centogene AG - the Rare Disease Company
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2022
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Oct 20, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2022
Giacomini Lab, University of California, San Francisco
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: in vitro;research

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 11, 2021
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 22, 2017
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 21, 2013
HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

May 18, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Pathogenic:2Benign:1
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

SLC22A5: PM5, BS2 -

Jul 30, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 25, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The A142S and R488H variants in the SLC22A5 gene have been reported previously in association with systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP) in patients who harbored A142S and R488H on the same SLC22A5 allele (in cis) with a third variant on the opposite allele (Amat di San Filippo et al., 2006, SLC22A5 Mutation database, www.arup.utah.edu; Mazzini et al. 2011). While the A142S variant was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 6500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, the R488H variant was observed with a frequency of 0.5%, 45/8600 alleles, in individuals of European American ancestry. When A142S and R488H were expressed individually in CHO cells, neither variant reduced carnitine transport (Amat di San Filippo et al., 2006). However, when A142S and R488H were present on the same allele, expression in CHO cells showed significantly impaired carnitine transport, indicating that A142S and R488H need to be present on the same SLC22A5 allele in order to impair function (Amat di San Filippo et al., 2006). Therefore when the R488H missense change is present without a second variant on the same SLC22A5 allele, it is not expected to be a pathogenic variant. -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Aug 15, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: SLC22A5 c.1463G>A (p.Arg488His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Major facilitator superfamily domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0046 in 1614104 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0055 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SLC22A5 causing Systemic Primary Carnitine Deficiency phenotype (0.0046). c.1463G>A has been reported to be in cis with c.424G>T (pathogenic) in the literature in at least one individual affected with Systemic Primary Carnitine Deficiency (e.g. Amat di San Filippo_2006). The variant has been reported in at least one patient with Hypoketotic hypoglycemia and Abnormality of carnitine metabolism, in trans with a VUS (Barbosa-Gouveia_2021). In addition, c.1463G>A in isolation has been reported in general population and is not in linkage disequilibrium with c.424G>T (gnomAD database, Toh_2010). Two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in 30%-50% of wild type Carnitine transport activity (Amat di San Filippo_2006, Frigeni_2017). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 34440436, 21126579, 28841266, 20208395). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 38794). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Sep 17, 2018
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Arg488His var iant in SLC22A5 has been reported in the compound heterozgous state in at least 5 individuals with primary carnitine deficiency (di San Filippo 2006, Mazzini 20 11, Rose 2012, Frigeni 2017, Thompson 2018); however in all of these individuals a second variant (p.Ala142Ser) was identified on the same copy of the SLC22A5 g ene (in cis). Functional studies indicate that p.Arg488His does not significantl y impact carnitine transport alone, and must occur in cis with p.Ala142Ser to im pact protein function (di San Filippo 2006). However, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. The p.Arg488His variant has been i dentified in 0.47% (598/126640) of European chromosomes and 0.32% (884/277154) o f total chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database, including 6 homozygotes (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). It is also present in ClinVar with c onfliciting interpretations of pathogenicity (Variation ID# 38794). Computationa l prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong support for o r against an impact the protein. Finally, another variant at the same position ( p.Arg488Cys) has been identified in the homozygous state in one individual with primary carnitine deficiency (Schimmenti 2007). In summary, while the clinical s ignificance of this variant is uncertain, these data suggest that, in the absenc e of p.Ala142Ser, the p.Arg488His variant is unlikely to be disease causing. AMC G/AMP criteria applied: PS4_Supporting. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.10
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Pathogenic
32
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.54
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.62
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.017
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.57
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.38
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.084
T;T
Polyphen
0.97
D;.
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.79
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.30
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28383481; hg19: chr5-131729380; API