rs28385027
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.2075-12G>T variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000935 in 1,564,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
BLM
NM_000057.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_000057.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002911
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.757
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 15-90765284-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90765284-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 223543.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.005 (760/151960) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0173 (715/41442). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0162. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 367 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.2075-12G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000355112.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.2075-12G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000057.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00497 AC: 754AN: 151842Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
754
AN:
151842
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00116 AC: 291AN: 251338Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000751 AC XY: 102AN XY: 135826
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
291
AN:
251338
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
135826
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000498 AC: 703AN: 1412820Hom.: 6 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.000427 AC XY: 301AN XY: 705520
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
703
AN:
1412820
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
301
AN XY:
705520
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00500 AC: 760AN: 151960Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00494 AC XY: 367AN XY: 74266
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
760
AN:
151960
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
367
AN XY:
74266
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 06, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 31, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 02, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Dec 01, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at