rs28763927
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000262464.9(FBN2):c.7013-5T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0748 in 1,604,704 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,846 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000262464.9 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | c.7013-5T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000262464.9 | NP_001990.2 | |||
FBN2 | XM_017009228.3 | c.6860-5T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | XP_016864717.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.7013-5T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001999.4 | ENSP00000262464 | P1 | |||
FBN2 | ENST00000703783.1 | n.3797-5T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0709 AC: 10789AN: 152122Hom.: 450 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0749 AC: 18758AN: 250328Hom.: 761 AF XY: 0.0757 AC XY: 10237AN XY: 135304
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0752 AC: 109262AN: 1452464Hom.: 4396 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0760 AC XY: 54954AN XY: 723088
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0708 AC: 10786AN: 152240Hom.: 450 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0690 AC XY: 5137AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 04, 2013 | 7013-5T>C in intron 55 of FBN2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 8.3% (365/4404) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs28763927). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 29, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 22, 2017 | Variant summary: The FBN2 c.7013-5T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts the loss of an SRp40 binding motif. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant of interest has been observed in a large, broad control population, ExAC, in 9206/120128 control chromosomes (389 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0766349, which is approximately 61308 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at