rs28763927

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.7013-5T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0748 in 1,604,704 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,846 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.071 ( 450 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.075 ( 4396 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0007284
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.272
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 5-128280322-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128280322-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129048.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128280322-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0941 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkc.7013-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 55 of 64 ENST00000262464.9 NP_001990.2 P35556-1
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkc.6860-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 54 of 63 XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkc.7013-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 55 of 64 1 NM_001999.4 ENSP00000262464.4 P35556-1
FBN2ENST00000703783.1 linkn.3797-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 30 of 37

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0709
AC:
10789
AN:
152122
Hom.:
450
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0776
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0660
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0689
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0631
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.102
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0344
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0981
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0724
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0708
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0749
AC:
18758
AN:
250328
Hom.:
761
AF XY:
0.0757
AC XY:
10237
AN XY:
135304
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0808
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0808
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0702
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0606
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0993
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0445
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0744
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0716
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0752
AC:
109262
AN:
1452464
Hom.:
4396
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0760
AC XY:
54954
AN XY:
723088
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0754
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0778
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0673
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0615
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0992
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0435
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0750
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0792
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0708
AC:
10786
AN:
152240
Hom.:
450
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0690
AC XY:
5137
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0776
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0660
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0689
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0625
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.102
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0344
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0724
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0705
Alfa
AF:
0.0592
Hom.:
148
Bravo
AF:
0.0730
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0710
AC:
249
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0740
EpiControl
AF:
0.0760

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Nov 29, 2012
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 04, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

7013-5T>C in intron 55 of FBN2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 8.3% (365/4404) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs28763927). -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 22, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The FBN2 c.7013-5T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts the loss of an SRp40 binding motif. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant of interest has been observed in a large, broad control population, ExAC, in 9206/120128 control chromosomes (389 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0766349, which is approximately 61308 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
4.4
DANN
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00073
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.050
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28763927; hg19: chr5-127616014; COSMIC: COSV52516898; API