rs28763948

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.2778C>T(p.Ala926Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00173 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 22 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00099 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.79

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FBN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

congenital contractural arachnodactyly
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
carpal tunnel syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
macular degeneration, early-onset
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

FBN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 5-128350902-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128350902-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129038.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.79 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00891 (1356/152244) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0311 (1294/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0297. There are 22 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 621 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1356 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBN2	NM_001999.4 link	c.2778C>T	p.Ala926Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 65	ENST00000262464.9	NP_001990.2	P35556-1
FBN2	XM_017009228.3 link	c.2625C>T	p.Ala875Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 64		XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBN2	ENST00000262464.9 link	c.2778C>T	p.Ala926Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 65	1	NM_001999.4	ENSP00000262464.4		P35556-1
FBN2	ENST00000508989.5 link	c.2679C>T	p.Ala893Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 33	2		ENSP00000425596.1		D6RJI3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00889

AC:

1353

AN:

152126

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0312

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00382

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00249

AC:

626

AN:

251316

AF XY:

0.00190

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0337

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000986

AC:

1441

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000828

AC XY:

602

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0338

AC:

1132

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00195

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000719

AC:

AN:

1112004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00202

AC:

122

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

182

272

363

454

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

160

200

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00891

AC:

1356

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00834

AC XY:

621

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0311

AC:

1294

AN:

41558

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00281

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000194

AC:

AN:

5158

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000208

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00378

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

125

187

250

312

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00560

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0112

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Jul 12, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Jun 22, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

May 12, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 05, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

0.56

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.33

PhyloP100

-4.8

Mutation Taster

=83/17

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over