rs28763952

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.1466-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,612,352 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0082 ( 17 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003805
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.102

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
FBN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital contractural arachnodactyly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • carpal tunnel syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • macular degeneration, early-onset
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 5-128392160-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128392160-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129035.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00818 (1245/152122) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0283 (1174/41508). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0269. There are 17 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 586 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1245 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkc.1466-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 64 ENST00000262464.9 NP_001990.2
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkc.1313-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 9 of 63 XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkc.1466-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 64 1 NM_001999.4 ENSP00000262464.4
FBN2ENST00000508989.5 linkc.1367-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 9 of 32 2 ENSP00000425596.1
FBN2ENST00000703787.1 linkn.1173-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 9 of 9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00811
AC:
1232
AN:
152004
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0281
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00431
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00217
AC:
544
AN:
250804
AF XY:
0.00153
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0286
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000545
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000947
AC:
1383
AN:
1460230
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000862
AC XY:
626
AN XY:
726496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0302
AC:
1010
AN:
33422
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00125
AC:
56
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000230
AC:
6
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000302
AC:
26
AN:
86216
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53242
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00365
AC:
21
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000115
AC:
128
AN:
1110812
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00224
AC:
135
AN:
60336
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.462
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
59
118
176
235
294
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00818
AC:
1245
AN:
152122
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00788
AC XY:
586
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0283
AC:
1174
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00275
AC:
42
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000623
AC:
3
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10562
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000206
AC:
14
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00427
AC:
9
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
64
127
191
254
318
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00461
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00908
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 16, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Jul 07, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Nov 01, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Nov 01, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly;C4015286:Macular degeneration, early-onset Benign:1
Sep 14, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.54
PhyloP100
-0.10
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000038
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.068
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28763952; hg19: chr5-127727853; COSMIC: COSV52540635; API