rs28903086

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.379G>A(p.Val127Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00136 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.90

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009372592).

BP6

Variant 5-132579330-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132579330-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128023.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=5, Likely_benign=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00135 (1967/1461678) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00747 (43/5760). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0057. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1039 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.379G>A	p.Val127Ile	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.379G>A	p.Val127Ile	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4		Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000640655.2 link	c.82G>A	p.Val28Ile	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 26	5		ENSP00000491596.2		A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00147

AC:

223

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00400

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0158

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00165

AC:

414

AN:

251350

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00174

AC XY:

237

AN XY:

135844

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0100

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000719

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00195

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00277

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00135

AC:

1967

AN:

1461678

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00143

AC XY:

1039

AN XY:

727146

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00976

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000638

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00128

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00214

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00146

AC:

222

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00168

AC XY:

125

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00399

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00221

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00155

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00208

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00244

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00165

AC:

200

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00322

EpiControl

AF:

0.00225

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Dec 01, 2024	RAD50: BS2 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 21, 2014	RAD50 has been only recently described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood. This variant is denoted RAD50 c.379G>A at the cDNA level and p.Val127Ile (V127I) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Valine to a Isoleucine (GTC>ATC). RAD50 Val127Ile has been reported in two individuals with breast cancer in British studies and in two individuals with laryngeal cancer in a Polish study, but was also detected in at least five healthy controls (Tommiska 2006, Mosor 2010, Mosor 2013, Ziolkowska-Suchanek 2013). RAD50 Val127Ile was observed with an allele frequency of 0.1% in 1000 Genomes and at 0.2% and 0.05% in European and African Americans in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project respectively, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. This variant is a conservative substitution of one neutral non-polar amino acid for another, altering a position that is highly conserved throughout evolution, and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses are inconsistent with regard to the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function. At a molecular level, the impact of this missense variant on protein structure and function is not known and thus we consider this to be a variant of uncertain significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and the RAD50 gene, remain unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden	Nov 03, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 29, 2016	Variant summary: The RAD50 c.379G>A (p.Val127Ile) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 205/124248 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) at a frequency of 0.0016499, which is approximately 26 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD50 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. This variant has been reported from case-control studies in literature. In a large case-control study, this variant was not associated with increased risk for breast cancer (Haiman_2013). 1/3 clinical diagnostic laboratories in ClinVar has classified this variant as likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Jul 07, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Oct 09, 2020	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jul 11, 2014	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 03, 2025	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Jun 22, 2021

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.078

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.45

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.023

.;.;.;T;T;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.66

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.68

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.97

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

.;.;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0094

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

.;.;.;.;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.51

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.85

.;.;.;N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.14

Sift

Benign

0.25

.;.;.;T;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.20

.;.;.;T;T;T

Polyphen

1.0

.;.;.;.;D;.

Vest4

0.27

MVP

0.60

ClinPred

0.035

GERP RS

5.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.23

gMVP

0.32

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over