rs3092881

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.380+12T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00189 in 1,533,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 35 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

RB1
NM_000321.3 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.955

Variant links:

Genes affected

RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RB1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 13-48342726-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-48342726-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 92845.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-48342726-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00998 (1519/152164) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0347 (1441/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0332. There are 35 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 747 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1519 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RB1	NM_000321.3 link	c.380+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 26	ENST00000267163.6	NP_000312.2	P06400A0A024RDV3
RB1	NM_001407165.1 link	c.380+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 26		NP_001394094.1
RB1	NM_001407166.1 link	c.380+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 16		NP_001394095.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RB1	ENST00000267163.6 link	c.380+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 26	1	NM_000321.3	ENSP00000267163.4	P06400
RB1	ENST00000467505.5 link	n.138-17291T>C	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	1		ENSP00000434702.1	Q92728
RB1	ENST00000650461.1 link	c.380+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 26			ENSP00000497193.1	A0A3B3IS71
RB1	ENST00000525036.1 link	n.542+12T>C	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 6	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00996

AC:

1515

AN:

152046

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0347

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000736

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00813

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00264

AC:

659

AN:

249928

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00180

AC XY:

244

AN XY:

135350

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0358

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000164

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000821

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000999

AC:

1379

AN:

1380980

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000862

AC XY:

596

AN XY:

691524

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0344

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000142

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000558

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00215

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00998

AC:

1519

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0100

AC XY:

747

AN XY:

74400

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0347

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000736

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00804

Alfa

AF:

0.00519

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0115

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000868

AC:

AN:

3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinoblastoma

Benign:4

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2024

Genetic Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Case and Pedigree Information: BILATERAL CASES:0, UNILATERAL CASES:1, TOTAL CASES:1, PEDIGREES:1. ACMG Codes Applied:BS1, BP4 -

not specified

Benign:3

Dec 27, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 06, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Nov 29, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The RB1 c.380+12T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 383/118794 control chromosomes (5 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0032241, which is approximately 77 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RB1 variant (0.0000417), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.67

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over