rs33963617

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.2097C>T​(p.Ala699Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00899 in 1,585,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 169 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0080 ( 22 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0091 ( 147 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.147
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 5-1279324-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1279324-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 39107.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-1279324-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.147 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.065 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TERTNM_198253.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2097C>T p.Ala699Ala synonymous_variant 5/16 ENST00000310581.10 NP_937983.2 O14746-1
TERTNM_001193376.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2097C>T p.Ala699Ala synonymous_variant 5/15 NP_001180305.1 O14746-3
TERTNR_149162.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.2176C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/13
TERTNR_149163.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.2176C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TERTENST00000310581.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2097C>T p.Ala699Ala synonymous_variant 5/161 NM_198253.3 ENSP00000309572.5 O14746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00797
AC:
1213
AN:
152200
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0708
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00765
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00797
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0114
AC:
2269
AN:
198788
Hom.:
71
AF XY:
0.0116
AC XY:
1257
AN XY:
108620
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00300
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00728
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0808
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00586
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00748
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00821
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00910
AC:
13043
AN:
1433384
Hom.:
147
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00910
AC XY:
6470
AN XY:
710636
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00285
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00722
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00640
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0107
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00796
AC:
1212
AN:
152318
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00804
AC XY:
599
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0710
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00745
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00797
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.00662
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00772
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0350
AC:
121
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Ala699Ala in exon 5 of TERT: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.8% (65/8514) of Eur opean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs33963617). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 07, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 1 Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.51
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33963617; hg19: chr5-1279439; COSMIC: COSV57230878; API