rs34165241
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.6782T>C(p.Met2261Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0515 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,505 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022455.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSD1 | NM_022455.5 | c.6782T>C | p.Met2261Thr | missense_variant | 23/23 | ENST00000439151.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSD1 | ENST00000439151.7 | c.6782T>C | p.Met2261Thr | missense_variant | 23/23 | 1 | NM_022455.5 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0486 AC: 7400AN: 152140Hom.: 198 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0466 AC: 11716AN: 251250Hom.: 350 AF XY: 0.0484 AC XY: 6577AN XY: 135804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0518 AC: 75775AN: 1461848Hom.: 2306 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0528 AC XY: 38373AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0487 AC: 7409AN: 152258Hom.: 199 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0477 AC XY: 3553AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2013 | - - |
Sotos syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 13, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at