rs34393923
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006846.4(SPINK5):c.1322G>A(p.Arg441His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00132 in 1,613,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R441C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006846.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00709 AC: 1078AN: 152056Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00180 AC: 448AN: 248994 AF XY: 0.00141 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000724 AC: 1058AN: 1461446Hom.: 17 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000679 AC XY: 494AN XY: 727030 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00708 AC: 1078AN: 152174Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00640 AC XY: 476AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Ichthyosis linearis circumflexa Benign:1
- -
Netherton syndrome Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at