rs34418677

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004863.4(SPTLC2):c.1428T>G(p.Pro476Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00215 in 1,614,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 82 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 46 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 36 hom. )

Consequence

SPTLC2
NM_004863.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.30

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SPTLC2 (HGNC:11278): (serine palmitoyltransferase long chain base subunit 2) This gene encodes a long chain base subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase. Serine palmitoyltransferase, which consists of two different subunits, is the key enzyme in sphingolipid biosynthesis. It catalyzes the pyridoxal-5-prime-phosphate-dependent condensation of L-serine and palmitoyl-CoA to 3-oxosphinganine. Mutations in this gene were identified in patients with hereditary sensory neuropathy type I. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]

SPTLC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 1C
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

SPTLC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).

BP6

Variant 14-77521457-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-77521457-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 314668.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.3 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0113 (1721/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0393 (1634/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0377. There are 46 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 781 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1721 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SPTLC2	NM_004863.4 link	c.1428T>G	p.Pro476Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 12	ENST00000216484.7	NP_004854.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SPTLC2	ENST00000216484.7 link	c.1428T>G	p.Pro476Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 12	1	NM_004863.4	ENSP00000216484.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0113

AC:

1721

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0394

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00367

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0100

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00301

AC:

758

AN:

251426

AF XY:

0.00225

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0426

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000114

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00119

AC:

1746

AN:

1461862

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00107

AC XY:

778

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0438

AC:

1466

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00123

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00277

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000432

AC:

AN:

1112000

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00255

AC:

154

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

190

286

381

476

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

150

200

250

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0113

AC:

1721

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0105

AC XY:

781

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0393

AC:

1634

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00366

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000147

AC:

AN:

68042

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00993

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

155

232

310

387

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00550

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0129

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 1C

Benign:4

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 02, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

SPTLC2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 29, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

2.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

PhyloP100

-1.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=90/10

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over