rs34934920

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions.This sequence variant predicts a substitution of Proline with Leucine at codon 1787 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Pro1787Leu). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is SAS: 0.0413, which is considered to be too common for a pathogenic variant causing autosomal dominantly inherited MHS, BA1. This variant has been classified as Benign. Criteria implemented: BA1. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024515/MONDO:0007783/012

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 48 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 502 hom. )

Consequence

RYR1
NM_000540.3 missense

Scores

4
13

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.765

Publications

34 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR1 (HGNC:10483): (ryanodine receptor 1) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein functions as a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum but also serves to connect the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubule. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, central core disease, and minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RYR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • RYR1-related myopathy
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • central core myopathy
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • King-Denborough syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • benign Samaritan congenital myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • congenital myopathy with myasthenic-like onset
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR1NM_000540.3 linkc.5360C>T p.Pro1787Leu missense_variant Exon 34 of 106 ENST00000359596.8 NP_000531.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR1ENST00000359596.8 linkc.5360C>T p.Pro1787Leu missense_variant Exon 34 of 106 5 NM_000540.3 ENSP00000352608.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0169
AC:
2572
AN:
152230
Hom.:
49
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0215
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0195
AC:
4749
AN:
243108
AF XY:
0.0214
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000165
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00671
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0237
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0235
AC:
34311
AN:
1461176
Hom.:
502
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0242
AC XY:
17599
AN XY:
726918
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00415
AC:
139
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0134
AC:
599
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0263
AC:
687
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000302
AC:
12
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
3634
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00646
AC:
342
AN:
52910
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0368
AC:
212
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0246
AC:
27338
AN:
1111876
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0223
AC:
1348
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2242
4485
6727
8970
11212
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1060
2120
3180
4240
5300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0169
AC:
2569
AN:
152348
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0166
AC XY:
1235
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00459
AC:
191
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0175
AC:
268
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0277
AC:
96
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0479
AC:
231
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00612
AC:
65
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0510
AC:
15
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0240
AC:
1633
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
45
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
128
256
385
513
641
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0230
Hom.:
75
Bravo
AF:
0.0164
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0289
AC:
107
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0306
AC:
118
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00409
AC:
18
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0232
AC:
199
ExAC
AF:
0.0191
AC:
2315
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
46
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0281
EpiControl
AF:
0.0259

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Mar 04, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 21, 2018
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
RYR1 database
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Nov 06, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RYR1: BS1, BS2 -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:5
Mar 17, 2021
ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of Proline with Leucine at codon 1787 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Pro1787Leu). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is SAS: 0.0413, which is considered to be too common for a pathogenic variant causing autosomal dominantly inherited MHS, BA1. This variant has been classified as Benign. Criteria implemented: BA1. -

Jul 01, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Mar 05, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

RYR1-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuromuscular disease, congenital, with uniform type 1 fiber Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Central core myopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Malignant hypothermia Benign:1
Mar 25, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.59
.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.92
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.85
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0031
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.14
N;N
PhyloP100
0.77
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.055
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;T
Polyphen
0.016
B;B
Vest4
0.32
MPC
0.66
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
-0.016
Varity_R
0.059
gMVP
0.53
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34934920; hg19: chr19-38976655; API