rs34940368
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.3897C>T(p.Cys1299Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000996 in 1,614,176 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0053 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 9 hom. )
Consequence
COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous
NM_000088.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.772
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 17-50186425-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50186425-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35922.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50186425-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.772 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00528 (804/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0184 (765/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0173. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 380 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 804 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A1 | NM_000088.4 | c.3897C>T | p.Cys1299Cys | synonymous_variant | 49/51 | ENST00000225964.10 | NP_000079.2 | |
COL1A1 | XM_011524341.2 | c.3699C>T | p.Cys1233Cys | synonymous_variant | 46/48 | XP_011522643.1 | ||
COL1A1 | XM_005257058.5 | c.3627C>T | p.Cys1209Cys | synonymous_variant | 47/49 | XP_005257115.2 | ||
COL1A1 | XM_005257059.5 | c.2979C>T | p.Cys993Cys | synonymous_variant | 36/38 | XP_005257116.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A1 | ENST00000225964.10 | c.3897C>T | p.Cys1299Cys | synonymous_variant | 49/51 | 1 | NM_000088.4 | ENSP00000225964.6 | ||
COL1A1 | ENST00000510710.3 | n.566C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00528 AC: 803AN: 152176Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
803
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00137 AC: 344AN: 251478Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 144AN XY: 135916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
344
AN:
251478
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
135916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000549 AC: 803AN: 1461882Hom.: 9 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000477 AC XY: 347AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
803
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
347
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00528 AC: 804AN: 152294Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00510 AC XY: 380AN XY: 74474
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
804
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
380
AN XY:
74474
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 27, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 09, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 05, 2017 | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing;curation | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 18, 2011 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 01, 2019 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 23, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at