rs34940368

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.3897C>T(p.Cys1299Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000996 in 1,614,176 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0053 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.772

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL1A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 17-50186425-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50186425-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35922.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50186425-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.772 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00528 (804/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0184 (765/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0173. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 380 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 804 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4 link	c.3897C>T	p.Cys1299Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 51	ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2	P02452
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2 link	c.3699C>T	p.Cys1233Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 46 of 48		XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5 link	c.3627C>T	p.Cys1209Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 47 of 49		XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5 link	c.2979C>T	p.Cys993Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 36 of 38		XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10 link	c.3897C>T	p.Cys1299Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 51	1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6		P02452
COL1A1	ENST00000510710.3 link	n.566C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00528

AC:

803

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0184

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00137

AC:

344

AN:

251478

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00106

AC XY:

144

AN XY:

135916

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0181

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000549

AC:

803

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000477

AC XY:

347

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0182

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000324

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00124

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00528

AC:

804

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00510

AC XY:

380

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0184

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000474

Alfa

AF:

0.00245

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00631

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Mar 27, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 06, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 09, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 01, 2019

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Apr 23, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.090

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over