rs34949635

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_007272.3(CTRC):​c.514A>G​(p.Lys172Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00515 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 372 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K172K) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 ( 194 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 178 hom. )

Consequence

CTRC
NM_007272.3 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.55

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTRC (HGNC:2523): (chymotrypsin C) This gene encodes a member of the peptidase S1 family. The encoded protein is a serum calcium-decreasing factor that has chymotrypsin-like protease activity. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CTRC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary chronic pancreatitis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00475654).
BP6
Variant 1-15444626-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-15444626-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260158.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0873 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CTRCNM_007272.3 linkc.514A>G p.Lys172Glu missense_variant Exon 6 of 8 ENST00000375949.5 NP_009203.2
CTRCXM_011540550.2 linkc.494-971A>G intron_variant Intron 5 of 6 XP_011538852.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTRCENST00000375949.5 linkc.514A>G p.Lys172Glu missense_variant Exon 6 of 8 1 NM_007272.3 ENSP00000365116.4
CTRCENST00000375943.6 linkc.*94-971A>G intron_variant Intron 3 of 4 1 ENSP00000365110.2
CTRCENST00000483406.1 linkn.404-971A>G intron_variant Intron 4 of 5 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0260
AC:
3961
AN:
152090
Hom.:
193
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0897
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0139
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00720
AC:
1811
AN:
251392
AF XY:
0.00557
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00391
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00297
AC:
4345
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
178
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00280
AC XY:
2033
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0943
AC:
3158
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00369
AC:
165
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00470
AC:
405
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00936
AC:
54
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000155
AC:
172
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00646
AC:
390
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
259
518
777
1036
1295
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
98
196
294
392
490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0261
AC:
3974
AN:
152208
Hom.:
194
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0251
AC XY:
1866
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0897
AC:
3725
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
166
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00539
AC:
26
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000324
AC:
22
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0142
AC:
30
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
193
386
580
773
966
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00562
Hom.:
66
Bravo
AF:
0.0298
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0883
AC:
389
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00886
AC:
1076
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0140
AC:
51
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary pancreatitis Benign:4
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 13, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:2
Dec 12, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.71
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.030
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.30
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0048
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.59
N
PhyloP100
1.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.12
N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.98
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.12
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
0.00094
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.76
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34949635; hg19: chr1-15771121; API