rs35085679
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.14917C>T(p.Leu4973Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0407 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,480 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182961.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.14917C>T | p.Leu4973Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 78 of 146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.14917C>T | p.Leu4973Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 78 of 146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224.5 | ||
SYNE1 | ENST00000423061.6 | c.14704C>T | p.Leu4902Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 77 of 146 | 1 | ENSP00000396024.1 | |||
SYNE1 | ENST00000490135.6 | n.2263C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 11 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0343 AC: 5222AN: 152174Hom.: 98 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0332 AC: 8345AN: 251462Hom.: 193 AF XY: 0.0348 AC XY: 4731AN XY: 135906
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0413 AC: 60397AN: 1461878Hom.: 1379 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0409 AC XY: 29737AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0344 AC: 5236AN: 152292Hom.: 101 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0333 AC XY: 2480AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
- -
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at