rs35187787
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1774G>A(p.Ala592Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00494 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A592D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1774G>A | p.Ala592Thr | missense_variant | 12/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1591G>A | p.Ala531Thr | missense_variant | 11/15 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.226G>A | p.Ala76Thr | missense_variant | 12/16 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-192G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 11/15 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1774G>A | p.Ala592Thr | missense_variant | 12/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | P1 | |
ENST00000563916.1 | n.263+1201C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00312 AC: 474AN: 152088Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00325 AC: 818AN: 251486Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00328 AC XY: 446AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00514 AC: 7507AN: 1461856Hom.: 26 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00508 AC XY: 3697AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00311 AC: 473AN: 152206Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00304 AC XY: 226AN XY: 74408
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | CDH1: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 26, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CDH1 p.Ala592Thr variant was identified in 19 of 5458 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from individuals or families with gastric, breast and ovarian cancers; and was present in 8 of 1472 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Garziera 2013, Huiping 2001, Salahshor 2001, Schrader 2011, Stuebs 2017, Valente 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs35187787) as “with Uncertain significance, other allele”. In addition, the variant was identified in the ClinVar and Clinvitae database (as likely benign by GeneDx, Illumina clinical Services, Centre for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Pathway Genomics, CSER, University of Washington; as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Vantari Genetics; and with uncertain significance by Biesecker Lab/Human Development Section, NIH). The variant was also listed in the Cosmic database 4x as pathogenic with a FATHMM prediction score of 0.99; in the Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database 6x (frequency 0.003), and in the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database 3x. The variant was not identified in the MutDB database. Furthermore, the variant was also listed in the 1000 Genomes Project in 6 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) and in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 54 of 8600 European American alleles and in 5 of 4396 African American alleles. The variant was identified in control databases in 893 of 277218 chromosomes (4 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 21 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009), Other in 24 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 65 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European Non-Finnish in 609 of 126710 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 30 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Finnish in 43 of 25794 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), and South Asian in 101 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.003); while the variant was not observed in the East Asian population. In one study, the frequency (0.06, n=3) of the p.Ala592Thr variant in 50 gastric tumors is almost four-fold that in normal population, suggesting that this variant indeed contributed to the tumorigenesis in a subset of gastric tumors. The authors concluded that the p.Ala592Thr variant may increase the lifetime risk of developing gastric cancer as a low penetrance variant (Huiping 2001). However allelic association studies do not support an effect of this alteration in predisposing to breast cancer in general as the variant was seen at similar frequencies between case and control groups (Salahshor 2001). In further research the p.Ala592Thr variant was again identified in both cases and controls, suggesting an improbable effect on gastric cancer pathogenesis. (Garziera 2013). In addition functional studies also support a non-pathogenic role; the p.Ala592Thr variant shows no detectable effect on adhesion activation and behaves like wild-type E-cadherin when treated with adhesion activating reagents (Petrova 2016), and cells expressing the E-cadherin variant behave like wild-type in regards to migration and aggregation (Kreller 2004). The p.Ala592 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein and this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 22, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Jul 24, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BA1 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Dec 17, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 10, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Aug 07, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 17, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 08, 2023 | The c.1774G>A (p.Ala592Thr) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00481 (0.48%, 609/126,710 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Oct 03, 2023 | BA1 based on allele frequency in NFE of 0.00472 in gnomAD. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 10, 2022 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0476089:Endometrial carcinoma;C0919267:Neoplasm of ovary;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma;C4551988:Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at