rs35462421
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004544.4(NDUFA10):c.712G>A(p.Glu238Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00635 in 1,613,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0057 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0064 ( 45 hom. )
Consequence
NDUFA10
NM_004544.4 missense
NM_004544.4 missense
Scores
10
5
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.52
Genes affected
NDUFA10 (HGNC:7684): (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A10) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of 42 kDa complex I, the first enzyme complex in the electron transport chain of mitochondria. This protein has NADH dehydrogenase activity and oxidoreductase activity. It transfers electrons from NADH to the respiratory chain. A mutation in this gene was found in an individual with Leigh syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, MutationAssessor, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016113639).
BP6
Variant 2-240011654-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-240011654-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138437.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0057 (868/152294) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00941 (144/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00838. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 397 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDUFA10 | NM_004544.4 | c.712G>A | p.Glu238Lys | missense_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000252711.7 | NP_004535.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDUFA10 | ENST00000252711.7 | c.712G>A | p.Glu238Lys | missense_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_004544.4 | ENSP00000252711.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00570 AC: 868AN: 152176Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
868
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00579 AC: 1456AN: 251482Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00601 AC XY: 817AN XY: 135908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1456
AN:
251482
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
817
AN XY:
135908
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00642 AC: 9384AN: 1461344Hom.: 45 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00644 AC XY: 4684AN XY: 727014
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9384
AN:
1461344
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
4684
AN XY:
727014
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00570 AC: 868AN: 152294Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00533 AC XY: 397AN XY: 74462
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
868
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
397
AN XY:
74462
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
25
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
29
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
69
ExAC
AF:
AC:
650
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | NDUFA10: BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 11, 2017 | - - |
Leigh syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NDUFA10 p.E238K variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs35462421) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and three other laboratories; and as benign by GeneDx and Illumina). The variant was identified in control databases in 1601 of 282886 chromosomes (7 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005660, and was observed at the highest frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population in 1009 of 129192 chromosomes (5 homozygous) (freq: 0.007810) (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The p.E238 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (MUT Assesor, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, MutationTaster, Revel, FATHMM, MetaLR, DANN) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however this is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (Splice AI exome) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 07, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 22 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Feb 07, 2022 | - - |
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
.;M;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.85, 0.84, 0.85, 0.81
MVP
MPC
0.68
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at