rs35498994
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):c.61A>T(p.Met21Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00465 in 1,614,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 260 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M21V) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018451.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | NM_018451.5 | c.61A>T | p.Met21Leu | missense_variant | 2/17 | ENST00000381884.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | ENST00000381884.9 | c.61A>T | p.Met21Leu | missense_variant | 2/17 | 1 | NM_018451.5 | P1 | |
CENPJ | ENST00000616936.4 | c.61A>T | p.Met21Leu | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/16 | 1 | |||
CENPJ | ENST00000545981.6 | c.61A>T | p.Met21Leu | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/18 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00529 AC: 805AN: 152124Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 2880AN: 250918Hom.: 87 AF XY: 0.0100 AC XY: 1357AN XY: 135604
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00458 AC: 6698AN: 1461850Hom.: 238 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00439 AC XY: 3192AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00530 AC: 807AN: 152242Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00607 AC XY: 452AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 07, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 25, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at