rs35658323
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM2PM5BP4_Moderate
The NM_000518.5(HBB):āc.379G>Cā(p.Val127Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as other (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V127A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000518.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB | NM_000518.5 | c.379G>C | p.Val127Leu | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000335295.4 | NP_000509.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB | ENST00000335295.4 | c.379G>C | p.Val127Leu | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_000518.5 | ENSP00000333994 | P1 | |
HBB | ENST00000647020.1 | c.379G>C | p.Val127Leu | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENSP00000494175 | P1 | |||
HBB | ENST00000475226.1 | n.311G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 2 | |||||
HBB | ENST00000633227.1 | c.*195G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 3/3 | 3 | ENSP00000488004 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461750Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727200
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
HEMOGLOBIN MOLFETTA Other:1
other, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Dec 12, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at