rs357564
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.3944C>T(p.Pro1315Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.353 in 1,612,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 103,984 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1315H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000264.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTCH1 | NM_000264.5 | c.3944C>T | p.Pro1315Leu | missense_variant | 23/24 | ENST00000331920.11 | |
PTCH1 | NM_001083603.3 | c.3941C>T | p.Pro1314Leu | missense_variant | 23/24 | ENST00000437951.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTCH1 | ENST00000331920.11 | c.3944C>T | p.Pro1315Leu | missense_variant | 23/24 | 5 | NM_000264.5 | A2 | |
PTCH1 | ENST00000437951.6 | c.3941C>T | p.Pro1314Leu | missense_variant | 23/24 | 5 | NM_001083603.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.330 AC: 50147AN: 151954Hom.: 8752 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.389 AC: 95817AN: 246178Hom.: 19668 AF XY: 0.388 AC XY: 52207AN XY: 134464
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.356 AC: 519565AN: 1460908Hom.: 95236 Cov.: 70 AF XY: 0.358 AC XY: 259922AN XY: 726768
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.330 AC: 50158AN: 152072Hom.: 8748 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.338 AC XY: 25139AN XY: 74320
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 29, 2016 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Gorlin syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29081410, 24728327, 27153395, 15888139, 22703879) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 24, 2016 | Variant summary: The PTCH1 c.3944C>T (p.Pro1315Leu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO and MutationTaster not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 44727/116034 control chromosomes (9126 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.3854646, which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PTCH1 variant (0.0000171), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 01, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at