rs36092484

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001114753.3(ENG):c.1060C>T(p.Leu354Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0149 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 480 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 181 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 299 hom. )

Consequence

ENG
NM_001114753.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.21

Variant links:

Genes affected

ENG (HGNC:3349): (endoglin) This gene encodes a homodimeric transmembrane protein which is a major glycoprotein of the vascular endothelium. This protein is a component of the transforming growth factor beta receptor complex and it binds to the beta1 and beta3 peptides with high affinity. Mutations in this gene cause hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, also known as Osler-Rendu-Weber syndrome 1, an autosomal dominant multisystemic vascular dysplasia. This gene may also be involved in preeclampsia and several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

ENG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 9-127824378-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-127824378-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137210.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-127824378-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0865 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ENG	NM_001114753.3 link	c.1060C>T	p.Leu354Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	ENST00000373203.9	NP_001108225.1	P17813-1Q96CG0A0A024R878
ENG	NM_000118.4 link	c.1060C>T	p.Leu354Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 14		NP_000109.1	P17813-2Q5T9B9
ENG	NM_001278138.2 link	c.514C>T	p.Leu172Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15		NP_001265067.1	P17813Q96CG0F5GX88B7Z6Y5
ENG	NM_001406715.1 link	c.1060C>T	p.Leu354Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 8		NP_001393644.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ENG	ENST00000373203.9 link	c.1060C>T	p.Leu354Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	1	NM_001114753.3	ENSP00000362299.4	P17813-1
ENG	ENST00000344849.4 link	c.1060C>T	p.Leu354Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 14	1		ENSP00000341917.3	P17813-2
ENG	ENST00000480266.6 link	c.514C>T	p.Leu172Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	2		ENSP00000479015.1	F5GX88
ENG	ENST00000486329.1 link	n.28C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 3	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0334

AC:

5084

AN:

152110

Hom.:

180

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0890

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0147

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00433

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00559

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0310

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0235

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0161

AC:

4056

AN:

251414

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0144

AC XY:

1956

AN XY:

135908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0929

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00604

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00427

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00379

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0320

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0124

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0122

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0129

AC:

18907

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

299

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0124

AC XY:

8993

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.102

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00715

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00348

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00365

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0308

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0141

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0334

AC:

5092

AN:

152228

Hom.:

181

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0333

AC XY:

2478

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0889

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0146

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00433

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00539

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0310

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0232

Alfa

AF:

0.0167

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0360

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00883

EpiControl

AF:

0.00830

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Feb 21, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Leu354Leu in exon 8 of ENG: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 9.7% (427/4406) of Afr ican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs36092484). -

Mar 28, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 1

Benign:2

Sep 25, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 08, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.83

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over