rs363835

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 3P and 20B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000138.5(FBN1):​c.6832C>T​(p.Pro2278Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00186 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P2278A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0097 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 25 hom. )

Consequence

FBN1
NM_000138.5 missense

Scores

2
8
6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain EGF-like 39; calcium-binding (size 43) in uniprot entity FBN1_HUMAN there are 19 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (90%) in NM_000138.5
PP2
Missense variant in the FBN1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 1311 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 112 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 5.0644 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 8.1787 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to MASS syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, geleophysic dysplasia, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, Acromicric dysplasia, familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome, ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant, Marfan syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant, isolated ectopia lentis, neonatal Marfan syndrome, stiff skin syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.02039355).
BP6
Variant 15-48430710-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48430710-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36108.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48430710-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00967 (1472/152226) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0338 (1402/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0323. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 669 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1472 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN1NM_000138.5 linkc.6832C>T p.Pro2278Ser missense_variant Exon 56 of 66 ENST00000316623.10 NP_000129.3 P35555
FBN1NM_001406716.1 linkc.6832C>T p.Pro2278Ser missense_variant Exon 55 of 65 NP_001393645.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN1ENST00000316623.10 linkc.6832C>T p.Pro2278Ser missense_variant Exon 56 of 66 1 NM_000138.5 ENSP00000325527.5 P35555

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00968
AC:
1472
AN:
152110
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00260
AC:
653
AN:
251282
Hom.:
8
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
258
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0356
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1533
AN:
1461588
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000849
AC XY:
617
AN XY:
727116
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0367
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000562
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00197
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00967
AC:
1472
AN:
152226
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00899
AC XY:
669
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.000973
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.0111
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0353
AC:
155
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00334
AC:
406
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:8
Mar 31, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 26, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19293843, 27160103, 24793577, 26332594) -

Dec 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

FBN1: BS1, BS2 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Jan 02, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 19, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 17, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Marfan syndrome Benign:3
Sep 27, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 07, 2012
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 13, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 04, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Pro2278Ser in exon 55 of FBN1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 3.5% (155/4396) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs363835). -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:2
Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1
Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1
Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Jan 31, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.040
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.50
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.52
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.020
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.065
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.52
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.1
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.54
Sift
Benign
0.035
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.074
T
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.65
MPC
1.4
ClinPred
0.039
T
GERP RS
5.9

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs363835; hg19: chr15-48722907; API