rs363847

Variant names:

• chr15-48411104-A-G
• rs363847
• NM_000138.5:c.8502T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000138.5(FBN1):​c.8502T>C​(p.Thr2834Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 (1 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 (8 hom.)
• Consequence: FBN1 NM_000138.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:21
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.561
• Publications: 3 publications found

Genes affected

FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

FBN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
• Marfan syndrome

  Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
• Acromicric dysplasia

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
• progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
• stiff skin syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• geleophysic dysplasia

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• isolated ectopia lentis

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• neonatal Marfan syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Weill-Marchesani syndrome

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant

  Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
• Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome

  Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
• BP6: Variant 15-48411104-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48411104-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 36132.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.561 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00145 (220/152238) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00249 (38/15288). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00195. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 98 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBN1	NM_000138.5	c.8502T>C	p.Thr2834Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 66 of 66	ENST00000316623.10	NP_000129.3
FBN1	NM_001406716.1	c.8502T>C	p.Thr2834Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 65 of 65		NP_001393645.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBN1	ENST00000316623.10	c.8502T>C	p.Thr2834Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 66 of 66	1	NM_000138.5	ENSP00000325527.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00145 AC: 220 AN: 152120 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000604

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00249

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000415

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00223

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00111 AC: 279 AN: 251326 AF XY: 0.00113

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000739

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000578

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00180

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000979

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00232 AC: 3392 AN: 1461824 Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00231 AC XY: 1681 AN XY: 727214

African (AFR) AF: 0.000478 AC: 16 AN: 33480

American (AMR) AF: 0.000626 AC: 28 AN: 44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 26132

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 39690

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00112 AC: 97 AN: 86254

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.000112 AC: 6 AN: 53418

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00282 AC: 3139 AN: 1111970

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00176 AC: 106 AN: 60392

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00145 AC: 220 AN: 152238 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 98 AN XY: 74430

African (AFR) AF: 0.000602 AC: 25 AN: 41540

American (AMR) AF: 0.00249 AC: 38 AN: 15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3470

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5178

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000415 AC: 2 AN: 4818

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10608

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 294

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00223 AC: 152 AN: 68022

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00142 AC: 3 AN: 2108

Alfa AF: 0.00149 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00148

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00245

EpiControl AF: 0.00196

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:21

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Dec 16, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Thr2834Thr in exon 65 of FBN1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.3% (28/8592) of Euro pean American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.w ashington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs363847). -

Sep 30, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 13, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Marfan syndrome Benign:4

Jun 01, 2018

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:1 Benign:2

Aug 17, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:3

Jun 10, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

FBN1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

FBN1-related disorder Benign:1

Dec 10, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.51
CADD	Benign	6.1
DANN	Benign	0.74
PhyloP100		0.56
Mutation Taster		=100/0	polymorphism

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs363847; hg19: chr15-48703301;