rs368330593
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000500.9(CYP21A2):c.227G>A(p.Arg76Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000224 in 1,418,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000500.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP21A2 | NM_000500.9 | c.227G>A | p.Arg76Lys | missense_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000644719.2 | NP_000491.4 | |
CYP21A2 | NM_001368143.2 | c.-198G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/10 | NP_001355072.1 | |||
CYP21A2 | NM_001128590.4 | c.202+122G>A | intron_variant | NP_001122062.3 | ||||
CYP21A2 | NM_001368144.2 | c.-133+122G>A | intron_variant | NP_001355073.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP21A2 | ENST00000644719.2 | c.227G>A | p.Arg76Lys | missense_variant | 2/10 | NM_000500.9 | ENSP00000496625 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00112 AC: 170AN: 151686Hom.: 1 Cov.: 28
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000194 AC: 35AN: 180472Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000113 AC XY: 11AN XY: 97338
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000117 AC: 148AN: 1266810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 20 AF XY: 0.0000867 AC XY: 55AN XY: 634612
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00112 AC: 170AN: 151804Hom.: 1 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000849 AC XY: 63AN XY: 74178
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 03, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at