Menu
GeneBe

rs369399624

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The ENST00000330775.9(SLC37A4):c.492C>T(p.Ser164=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000148 in 1,612,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SLC37A4
ENST00000330775.9 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.55
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC37A4 (HGNC:4061): (solute carrier family 37 member 4) This gene regulates glucose-6-phosphate transport from the cytoplasm to the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum, in order to maintain glucose homeostasis. It also plays a role in ATP-mediated calcium sequestration in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various forms of glycogen storage disease. Alternative splicing in this gene results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 11-119027762-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119027762-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 302706.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-119027762-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.55 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC37A4NM_001164277.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.492C>T p.Ser164= synonymous_variant 5/11 ENST00000642844.3
SLC37A4NM_001164279.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.273C>T p.Ser91= synonymous_variant 5/11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC37A4ENST00000330775.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.492C>T p.Ser164= synonymous_variant 4/105 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152266
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000689
AC:
17
AN:
246696
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000374
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
133864
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000167
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000155
AC:
227
AN:
1460496
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000153
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
726438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000674
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152266
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000982

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type I Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 07, 2020Variant summary: SLC37A4 c.492C>T alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.9e-05 in 246696 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00013 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in SLC37A4 causing Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ib (6.9e-05 vs 0.0012), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.492C>T in individuals affected with Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ib and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory classified the variant as likely benign, and one laboratory classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Glucose-6-phosphate transport defect Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 18, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 18, 2024This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Glucose-6-phosphate transport defect;C0342749:Phosphate transport defect;C5561986:Congenital disorder of glycosylation, type IIw Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoOct 05, 2022This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.01% (9/68046) (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-119027762-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar, with multiple labs classifying this variant as Likely benign (Variation ID:302706). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. Of note, this variant is a silent variant and does not change the amino acid, reducing the probability that this variant is disease causing. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
Cadd
Benign
10
Dann
Benign
0.84
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs369399624; hg19: chr11-118898472; API