rs369894731

Positions:

chr7-30631490-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):c.1852G>A(p.Val618Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000595 in 1,613,252 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.72

Variant links:

Genes affected

GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

GARS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.21099356).

BP6

Variant 7-30631490-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30631490-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 216550.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000527 (8/151794) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000118 (8/68002). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000584. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GARS1	NM_002047.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1852G>A	p.Val618Ile	missense_variant	15/17	ENST00000389266.8	NP_002038.2
GARS1	NM_001316772.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.1690G>A	p.Val564Ile	missense_variant	15/17		NP_001303701.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GARS1	ENST00000389266.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1852G>A	p.Val618Ile	missense_variant	15/17	1	NM_002047.4	ENSP00000373918	P2	P41250-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000527

AC:

AN:

151794

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000843

AC:

AN:

249202

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000104

AC XY:

AN XY:

135242

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000142

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000602

AC:

AN:

1461458

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000660

AC XY:

AN XY:

727032

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000693

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000527

AC:

AN:

151794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000540

AC XY:

AN XY:

74098

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000494

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000122

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000108

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:3Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic	Dec 18, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 18, 2019	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Jan 11, 2023	Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging. -

Tip-toe gait

Pathogenic:1

Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Practice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino

Hereditary motor sensory neuropathy (HMSN), also known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT), is the most commonly inherited peripheral polyneuropathy. It constitutes a group of inherited, progressive, motor and sensory peripheral nerve disorders with properties of demyelination, axonal degeneration, or both. It is classified by clinical characteristics, modes of inheritance, electrophysiologic features, metabolic defects, and specific gene markers. Our patients all walk on tiptoe, so they show similar symptoms. When we genetically test them with our toe walking panel, we find that around 90 per cent of them have a genetic variant that explains their toe walking. These can be assigned, for example, to the area of myopathies (such as variants of the COL6A3 gene), the area of hereditary neuropathies (such as variants of the KMT2C gene) or the area of metabolic diseases (such as variants of the PYGM gene). In a smaller group of patients with almost identical symptoms, no abnormality is found in the genes of our panel, but spastic paraplegia can be detected. In another small group of our toe walkers, no abnormalities can be detected in the genes analysed in our toe walking panel, nor do they suffer from spastic paraplegia, as is also the case with healthy children. In contrast to these, however, they show a tiptoe gait. These patients suffer from infantile cerebral palsy, in which toe walking can also be observed. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 15, 2024

This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 618 of the GARS protein (p.Val618Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs369894731, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GARS-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 216550). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GARS protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 03, 2020

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.075

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.057

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.080

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

0.050

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.26

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

M_CAP

Benign

0.035

MetaRNN

Benign

0.21

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.49

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.63

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.44

REVEL

Uncertain

0.37

Sift

Benign

0.27

Sift4G

Benign

0.60

Polyphen

0.049

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.68

MPC

0.36

ClinPred

0.084

GERP RS

5.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.32

gMVP

0.45

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over