rs370096856

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000138.5(FBN1):​c.8185A>C​(p.Lys2729Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,614,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00012 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00015 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

FBN1
NM_000138.5 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.55
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the FBN1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 1311 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 112 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 5.0644 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 8.1787 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to MASS syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, geleophysic dysplasia, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, Acromicric dysplasia, familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, progeroid and marfanoid aspect-lipodystrophy syndrome, ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant, Marfan syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome 2, dominant, isolated ectopia lentis, neonatal Marfan syndrome, stiff skin syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009807229).
BP6
Variant 15-48412610-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48412610-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 199954.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr15-48412610-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000125 (19/152346) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00393 (19/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 19 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN1NM_000138.5 linkc.8185A>C p.Lys2729Gln missense_variant Exon 65 of 66 ENST00000316623.10 NP_000129.3 P35555
FBN1NM_001406716.1 linkc.8185A>C p.Lys2729Gln missense_variant Exon 64 of 65 NP_001393645.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN1ENST00000316623.10 linkc.8185A>C p.Lys2729Gln missense_variant Exon 65 of 66 1 NM_000138.5 ENSP00000325527.5 P35555

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152228
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000258
AC:
65
AN:
251470
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000383
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000149
AC:
218
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000212
AC XY:
154
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152346
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.000362
AC:
44
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:1Benign:3
Nov 03, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 16, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Aug 16, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Marfan syndrome Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 01, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Apr 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

FBN1: PP2, BP4, BS1 -

not specified Benign:1
Jan 29, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Stiff skin syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Weill-Marchesani syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Geleophysic dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromicric dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Dec 12, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.89
Eigen
Benign
-0.16
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.038
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0098
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.65
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.28
N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.31
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.41
T
Vest4
0.24
MutPred
0.41
Loss of methylation at K2729 (P = 0.0045);
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.058
T
GERP RS
5.4

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs370096856; hg19: chr15-48704807; API