rs371877084
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001374258.1(BRAF):c.78G>T(p.Glu26Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00188 in 1,519,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 50 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E26K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374258.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.78G>T | p.Glu26Asp | missense_variant | 1/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.78G>T | p.Glu26Asp | missense_variant | 1/18 | ENST00000646891.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.78G>T | p.Glu26Asp | missense_variant | 1/20 | NM_001374258.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.78G>T | p.Glu26Asp | missense_variant | 1/18 | NM_004333.6 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0100 AC: 1515AN: 150862Hom.: 30 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00235 AC: 296AN: 125944Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00168 AC XY: 116AN XY: 69078
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000985 AC: 1347AN: 1368130Hom.: 20 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000820 AC XY: 554AN XY: 675502
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0100 AC: 1516AN: 150966Hom.: 30 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00964 AC XY: 711AN XY: 73790
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 05, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 20, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2017 | p.Glu26Asp in exon 1 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.7% (26/1496) of African American ch romosomes from a large population study by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs371877084). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Oct 28, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 02, 2023 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 10, 2012 | The variant is found in NOONAN panel(s). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Noonan syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Service de Génétique Moléculaire, Hôpital Robert Debré | - | - - |
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 20, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Mar 30, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at