rs372083517

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134407.3(GRIN2A):c.3702C>T(p.Phe1234Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000129 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

GRIN2A
NM_001134407.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.27

Variant links:

Genes affected

GRIN2A (HGNC:4585): (glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A) This gene encodes a member of the glutamate-gated ion channel protein family. The encoded protein is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit. NMDA receptors are both ligand-gated and voltage-dependent, and are involved in long-term potentiation, an activity-dependent increase in the efficiency of synaptic transmission thought to underlie certain kinds of memory and learning. These receptors are permeable to calcium ions, and activation results in a calcium influx into post-synaptic cells, which results in the activation of several signaling cascades. Disruption of this gene is associated with focal epilepsy and speech disorder with or without cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

GRIN2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).

BP6

Variant 16-9763842-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-9763842-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 129186.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.27 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000335 (51/152262) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00407 (21/5164). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00272. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 28 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 51 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GRIN2A	NM_001134407.3 link	c.3702C>T	p.Phe1234Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000330684.4	NP_001127879.1	Q12879-1Q547U9Q59EW6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GRIN2A	ENST00000330684.4 link	c.3702C>T	p.Phe1234Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_001134407.3	ENSP00000332549.3		Q12879-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000348

AC:

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00444

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000298

AC:

AN:

251382

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000236

AC XY:

AN XY:

135856

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00234

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00130

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000107

AC:

157

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000111

AC XY:

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000591

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000712

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000376

AC XY:

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000433

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00407

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000130

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000223

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0100

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

GRIN2A: BP4, BS1 -

Landau-Kleffner syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 05, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 19, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

8.6

DANN

Benign

0.62

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over