rs372116308

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_000642.3(AGL):c.4575T>A(p.Ile1525Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000152 in 1,609,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AGL
NM_000642.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.382

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

AGL (HGNC:321): (amylo-alpha-1, 6-glucosidase, 4-alpha-glucanotransferase) This gene encodes the glycogen debrancher enzyme which is involved in glycogen degradation. This enzyme has two independent catalytic activities which occur at different sites on the protein: a 4-alpha-glucotransferase activity and a amylo-1,6-glucosidase activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with glycogen storage disease although a wide range of enzymatic and clinical variability occurs which may be due to tissue-specific alternative splicing. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

AGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

glycogen storage disease III
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

AGL links:

ENSG00000288826 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288826 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

BP6

Variant 1-99921627-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-99921627-T-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 526607.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.382 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00015 (218/1457632) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00174 (10/5756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000942. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 131 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AGL	NM_000642.3 link	c.4575T>A	p.Ile1525Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 34 of 34	ENST00000361915.8	NP_000633.2	P35573-1A0A0S2A4E4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AGL	ENST00000361915.8 link	c.4575T>A	p.Ile1525Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 34 of 34	1	NM_000642.3	ENSP00000355106.3		P35573-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000620

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

250728

AF XY:

0.000273

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000328

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000150

AC:

218

AN:

1457632

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000181

AC XY:

131

AN XY:

725372

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33360

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000135

AC:

AN:

44582

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26070

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39556

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000627

AC:

AN:

86126

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53344

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00174

AC:

AN:

5756

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000119

AC:

132

AN:

1108606

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000249

AC:

AN:

60232

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.461

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41588

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000621

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000294

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000945

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000180

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000204

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000437

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease type III

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 31, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing -

Feb 06, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

8.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.54

PhyloP100

0.38

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over