rs3729711

Variant names:

• chr19-55156279-C-A
• rs3729711
• NM_000363.5:c.204G>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BA1

The NM_000363.5(TNNI3):​c.204G>T​(p.Arg68Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.049 in 1,611,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,119 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.039 (165 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.050 (1954 hom.)
• Consequence: TNNI3 NM_000363.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:19
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.100

Genes affected

TNNI3 (HGNC:11947): (troponin I3, cardiac type) Troponin I (TnI), along with troponin T (TnT) and troponin C (TnC), is one of 3 subunits that form the troponin complex of the thin filaments of striated muscle. TnI is the inhibitory subunit; blocking actin-myosin interactions and thereby mediating striated muscle relaxation. The TnI subfamily contains three genes: TnI-skeletal-fast-twitch, TnI-skeletal-slow-twitch, and TnI-cardiac. This gene encodes the TnI-cardiac protein and is exclusively expressed in cardiac muscle tissues. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy type 7 (CMH7) and familial restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Troponin I is useful in making a diagnosis of heart failure, and of ischemic heart disease. An elevated level of troponin is also now used as indicator of acute myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with moderate/severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Such elevation has also been associated with higher risk of mortality in cardiovascular disease patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

ENSG00000267110 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0021397173).
• BP6: Variant 19-55156279-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-55156279-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43366.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=11, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-55156279-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.1 with no splicing effect.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0552 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TNNI3	NM_000363.5	c.204G>T	p.Arg68Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 8	ENST00000344887.10	NP_000354.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TNNI3	ENST00000344887.10	c.204G>T	p.Arg68Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 8	1	NM_000363.5	ENSP00000341838.5
ENSG00000267110	ENST00000587871.1	n.*306G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 8 of 9	5		ENSP00000473050.1
ENSG00000267110	ENST00000587871.1	n.*306G>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 8 of 9	5		ENSP00000473050.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0392 AC: 5970 AN: 152140 Hom.: 165 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00889

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.122

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0314

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0380

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.0176

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0809

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0443

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0567

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0311

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0406 AC: 9592 AN: 236074 Hom.: 259 AF XY: 0.0416 AC XY: 5420 AN XY: 130170

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00726

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0164

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0436

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000571

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0214

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0796

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0568

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.0428

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0501 AC: 73045 AN: 1458744 Hom.: 1954 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0497 AC XY: 36095 AN XY: 725644

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00777

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0183

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0422

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000151

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0215

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0792

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0559

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0440

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0392 AC: 5968 AN: 152258 Hom.: 165 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0395 AC XY: 2938 AN XY: 74450

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00886

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0314

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0380

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.0176

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0809

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0567

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0313

Alfa AF: 0.0521 Hom.: 303

Bravo AF: 0.0349

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00688 AC: 25

ESP6500EA AF: 0.0505 AC: 402

ExAC AF: 0.0392 AC: 4675

Asia WGS AF: 0.00808 AC: 29 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:19

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2020

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 18, 2008

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:4

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2022

Cohesion Phenomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A Uncertain:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1 Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1

Mar 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7 Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Jun 18, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.37	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.26
CADD	Benign	11
DANN	Benign	0.93
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.66	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0021	T
GERP RS		2.1

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3729711; hg19: chr19-55667647;