rs373522639
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_005591.4(MRE11):āc.1643T>Cā(p.Ile548Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000292 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005591.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRE11 | NM_005591.4 | c.1643T>C | p.Ile548Thr | missense_variant | 15/20 | ENST00000323929.8 | NP_005582.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRE11 | ENST00000323929.8 | c.1643T>C | p.Ile548Thr | missense_variant | 15/20 | 1 | NM_005591.4 | ENSP00000325863 | P3 | |
MRE11 | ENST00000323977.7 | c.1643T>C | p.Ile548Thr | missense_variant | 15/19 | 1 | ENSP00000326094 | |||
MRE11 | ENST00000407439.7 | c.1652T>C | p.Ile551Thr | missense_variant | 15/20 | 2 | ENSP00000385614 | |||
MRE11 | ENST00000393241.8 | c.1643T>C | p.Ile548Thr | missense_variant | 15/20 | 5 | ENSP00000376933 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000796 AC: 20AN: 251232Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000663 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135764
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000306 AC: 448AN: 1461862Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000257 AC XY: 187AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74294
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder 1 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 13, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | MRE11 NM_005591.3 exon 15 p.Ile548Thr (c.1643T>C): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.01% (24/128966) of European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-94180525-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:142542). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 19, 2023 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 19, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in an individual with personal and/or family history of breast cancer (PMID: 36035419 (2022)). In a large-scale breast cancer association study, this variant was observed in individuals with breast cancer as well as in unaffected control individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00019 (24/128966 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 30, 2022 | The p.I548T variant (also known as c.1643T>C), located in coding exon 14 of the MRE11A gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1643. The isoleucine at codon 548 is replaced by threonine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 17, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 21, 2023 | Variant summary: MRE11 c.1643T>C (p.Ile548Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-05 in 251232 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MRE11 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1643T>C has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing in at least one individual with a personal and/or family history of cancer reportedly tested negative on routine BRCA analysis (e.g., Nunziato_2022). However, this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 36035419). Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Six submitters classifieid it as a variant of uncertain significance, while one submitter classified it as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at