rs373790607
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.2026+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00051 in 1,607,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00053 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 intron
NM_006231.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.11
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 12-132668626-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132668626-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 372006.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr12-132668626-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-132668626-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000525 (764/1455030) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00136 (117/86072). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00116. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 383 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.2026+9C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.2026+9C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152052Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
56
AN:
152052
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000375 AC: 94AN: 250584Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000480 AC XY: 65AN XY: 135500
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
94
AN:
250584
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
135500
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000525 AC: 764AN: 1455030Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000530 AC XY: 383AN XY: 722316
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
764
AN:
1455030
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
383
AN XY:
722316
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
56
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 19, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 05, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 31, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 30, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 06, 2015 | The c.2026+9C>T intronic alteration consists of a C to T substitution nucleotides after coding exon 18 in the POLE gene. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 07, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLE c.2026+9C>T variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs373790607) as "With other allele ", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; as likely benign Counsyl, GeneDx, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano). The variant was identified in control databases in 104 of 276484 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 5 of 23998 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 10 of 34348 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European in 53 of 126330 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), and South Asian in 36 of 30722 chromosomes (freq: 0.001); it was not observed in the “Other”, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and Finnish populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 15, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at