rs374310157
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.6387G>A(p.Ser2129=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000713 in 1,612,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S2129S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.6387G>A | p.Ser2129= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.6387G>A | p.Ser2129= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000307 AC: 77AN: 250810Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000258 AC XY: 35AN XY: 135576
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000746 AC: 109AN: 1460696Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000688 AC XY: 50AN XY: 726796
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74300
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 09, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Mar 14, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 09, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 03, 2016 | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 26, 2017 | Variant summary: The APC c.6387G>A (p.Ser2129Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide, 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 34/121086 (1/3561), predominantly in the Latino cohort, 30/11544 (1/384), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic APC variant of 1/14005. Therefore, suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of Latino origin. The variant of interest has not been, to our knowledge, reported in affected individuals via publications, although multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories cite the variant with a classification of "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 20, 2020 | - - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The APC p.Ser2129= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the COGR, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, UMD-LSDB, or in Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs374310157) as "With other allele ", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Color Genomics, Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, and one clinical laboratory), databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 80 of 276588 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.00015), Latino in 72 of 34390 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European in 6 of 126234 chromosomes (freq: 0.000048), and South Asian in 1 of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and in Finnish populations. The p.Ser2129= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at