Menu
GeneBe

rs375165807

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 3P and 6B. PM1PP2BP4BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.383A>G(p.Asn128Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000613 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N128D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000064 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 missense

Scores

1
8
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 13 uncertain in NM_004329.3
PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, BMPR1A
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.37535772).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000636 (93/1461874) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0000791 (88/1112004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000652. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 43 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BMPR1ANM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.383A>G p.Asn128Ser missense_variant 6/13 ENST00000372037.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BMPR1AENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.383A>G p.Asn128Ser missense_variant 6/131 NM_004329.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000278
AC:
7
AN:
251458
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135896
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000636
AC:
93
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000591
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000791
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74382
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000658
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000340
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 15, 2022This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 128 of the BMPR1A protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BMPR1A-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 7/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 18, 2021This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 22, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 31, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the BMPR1A gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.383A>G, in exon 6 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asn128Ser. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with BMPR1A-related disorders. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a low population frequency of 0.003% (dbSNP rs375165807). The p.Asn128Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in the extracellular domain of the BMPR1A protein. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Asn128Ser substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Asn128Ser change remains unknown at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthOct 30, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 128 of the BMPR1A protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 25559809). This variant has also been identified in 7/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 128 of the BMPR1A protein (p.Asn128Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs375165807, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with tubular adenoma and hyperplastic polyps (PMID: 25559809). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 186487). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (Invitae) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BMPR1A function with a negative predictive value of 95%. RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 05, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with personal and family history of colorectal cancer/polyps (Chubb et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22799562, 23433720, 10881198, 30787465, 25559809) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.041
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.68
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.20
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.064
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.38
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.35
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Uncertain
0.0040
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.063
T
Polyphen
0.036
B
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.23
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.60
gMVP
0.78

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375165807; hg19: chr10-88659600; API