rs375494746

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_014874.4(MFN2):​c.1495+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000925 in 1,598,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00097 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

MFN2
NM_014874.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
MFN2 (HGNC:16877): (mitofusin 2) This gene encodes a mitochondrial membrane protein that participates in mitochondrial fusion and contributes to the maintenance and operation of the mitochondrial network. This protein is involved in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and it may play a role in the pathophysiology of obesity. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A2, and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy VI, which are both disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Defects in this gene have also been associated with early-onset stroke. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 1-12004936-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-12004936-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 215515.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-12004936-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MFN2NM_014874.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1495+9C>T intron_variant ENST00000235329.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MFN2ENST00000235329.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1495+9C>T intron_variant 1 NM_014874.4 P1O95140-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000539
AC:
82
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000529
AC:
119
AN:
224798
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000485
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
121580
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000314
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000356
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000966
AC:
1397
AN:
1446622
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000982
AC XY:
706
AN XY:
718904
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000273
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000190
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000485
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000539
AC:
82
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000471
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.00103
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000586

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 08, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 18, 2019- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 06, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 08, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
0.29
DANN
Benign
0.68
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375494746; hg19: chr1-12064993; API