rs3758449
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):c.2867G>A(p.Ser956Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.533 in 1,613,650 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 231,940 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.51 ( 20443 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.54 ( 211497 hom. )
Consequence
MYO3A
NM_017433.5 missense
NM_017433.5 missense
Scores
1
17
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.36
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=7.164611E-5).
BP6
Variant 10-26157383-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26157383-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45804.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-26157383-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.55 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | NM_017433.5 | c.2867G>A | p.Ser956Asn | missense_variant | 26/35 | ENST00000642920.2 | NP_059129.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | ENST00000642920.2 | c.2867G>A | p.Ser956Asn | missense_variant | 26/35 | NM_017433.5 | ENSP00000495965.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.514 AC: 78050AN: 151834Hom.: 20442 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
78050
AN:
151834
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.502 AC: 126069AN: 251282Hom.: 32583 AF XY: 0.508 AC XY: 69015AN XY: 135800
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
126069
AN:
251282
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
69015
AN XY:
135800
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.535 AC: 782019AN: 1461698Hom.: 211497 Cov.: 56 AF XY: 0.534 AC XY: 388628AN XY: 727172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
782019
AN:
1461698
Hom.:
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
AC XY:
388628
AN XY:
727172
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.514 AC: 78075AN: 151952Hom.: 20443 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.514 AC XY: 38203AN XY: 74278
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
78075
AN:
151952
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
38203
AN XY:
74278
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2015
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2097
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2054
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4723
ExAC
AF:
AC:
61470
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1474
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Ser956Asn in Exon 26 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 46.5% (1739/3738) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3758449). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
.;T
Sift4G
Benign
.;T
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
0.033
MPC
0.058
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at